Saturday, April 19, 2025

Daredevil: Born Again (Spoilery Thoughts)

Photo courtesy of Marvel Television. © 2025 MARVEL. All Rights Reserved.


Netflix's Daredevil is one of my all time favourite comic book live-action adaptations. I consider it to be one of the best projects to have come from Marvel, and one of the best pieces of mainstream television in general. It's a gritty story about found family, the willingness to do good, and flawed people fighting their personal demons while accepting and supporting each other, that also happens to involve masked vigilantes and undead ninjas. Ten years later, going back and rewatching all 3 seasons in a row before diving into 'Daredevil: Born Again', further solidified this opinion. Having now watched every single episode of 'Born Again' as well, I can say that although it's not perfect, it has, all in all, fulfilled most of my expectations and left me wanting to watch what comes next.

Photo courtesy of Marvel Television. © 2025 MARVEL. All Rights Reserved.

It has been a decade since the premiere of the OG Daredevil, which makes how easily both Charlie Cox and Vincent D'Onofrio stepped back into their respective characters even more impressive. The same goes for Deborah Ann Woll as Karen, Elden Henson as Foggy, and Jon Bernthal as Frank Castle, for the brief moments that we get to see them. Continuing from the finale of Daredevil's Season 3 directly into 'Born Again' really felt like going back to that universe. Not everything is the same, characters' lives have taken different turns, and there's also a difference in tone, cinematography, and pacing, so the show might not live up to everyone's nostalgia, but it's still a solid continuation from where Daredevil Season 3 Ep13 'A New Napkin' left off.

To have a plot for a new show, it's unavoidable that the somewhat hopeful and uplifting ending of 'A New Napkin' has to be undone, and the band-aid is ripped off very fast, with the assassination of Foggy Nelson and Karen and Matt being driven apart by grief. The show was off to a strong and shocking start, but to claim that it survived its rewrites and creative overhaul completely unscathed would be a lie. There are certain decisions some characters make that don't really make sense, some things happening too serendipitously or too abruptly, and there's a general unevenness that can be attributed to the changes in the creative team for each episode, but in the end it still manges to land on its feet, especially after the season finale.

The acting remains brilliant, and the rivalry between Matt Murdock and Wilson Fisk, which takes centre stage, continues and evolves in a way that feels true to the characters. At the same time though, it's impossible to ignore the fact that 'Born Again' seems to be missing a big chunk of its heart. 

There's a Foggy and Karen shaped void that remains both palpable and unfilled throughout the biggest part of the season. One of the most prevalent, ongoing themes of the Netflix show was Matt's relationship with other people. How he was taught early on that having others to care about is a risk and a liability, his inner struggle between needing human connection and fearing the consequences that would bring, and how he avoided letting people in because of the abandonment that he felt from a young age and the loss and isolation he had experienced due to his circumstances. Eventually revealing, both to the audience and the characters, the complex reasons why Matt tended to push people away, how his vulnerability intertwined with his fear of abandonment, and having him realise the importance of his bond with Foggy, Karen, and the other people in his life as part of his growth.

'Born Again' doesn't necessarily undo any of that, but 10 years later we find Matt Murdock following a different life path, estranged from Karen, in a fancier office that lacks the charm and heart of "Nelson and Murdock", having left Daredevil behind him. Although it is still abundantly clear that his primary goal is to use whatever means he has to help the underdog. What feels really disappointing though, is how almost every single connection in Matt Murdock's life seems to be just surface-level and lacking substance.

Margarita Levieva is amazing in her performance, but the way her character as his girlfriend Heather Glenn is written makes it clear that the relationship isn't meant to last. Matt and Heather seem to be in a "dating for the sake of dating" situation, as there's no initial spark on their first date, and no apparent affection or companionship shown between them later on. She doesn't appear to know about his history with Fisk, nor do they appear to be on the same page on a significant number of issues. And it shouldn't really take a therapist to know that someone who has difficulty with opening up and letting people in, who at the same time is also grieving the loss of one of the closest people in his life, needs to be supported and not antagonised.

All of this makes it really hard to be invested in their connection, or to care when it inevitably falls apart. During the latter parts of the season, the way the character of Heather is presented feels like it's almost spoon-feeding to the audience the fact that she is intended to be disliked. Speaking of deliberately unlikeable characters, Michael Gandolfini shines as Daniel Blake, Fisk's sleazy, power-hungry lackey. The writing in this instance works far better, with Gandolfini giving a standout performance as a very intentionally insufferable and unscrupulous character, who rises in the ranks not because of his capabilities but due to his obsessive loyalty and adoration of Fisk.

Photo courtesy of Marvel Television. © 2025 MARVEL. All Rights Reserved.
The relationship between Matt Murdock and Wilson Fisk continues to be one of the most stable aspects that carries on with the show's revival in the way the two men seem to know and interact with each other. Fisk as the main villain of the series remains one of its biggest highlights, with Vincent D'Onofrio's excellent performance and the way the character acts living up to the standards set by the 2015 show, making the kind of extreme cruelty that the Kingpin is capable of even more brutally clear, and proving once again that a character doesn't need superpowers to be a terrifying villain. Another plus of this season is how it showcases the way Vanessa Fisk isn't only an intelligent manipulator but also matches the viciousness of her husband and is as much of a ruthless villain as he is, not just someone who tolerates or pretends to not see his darker side. Something that was only briefly touched upon in Daredevil Season 3.

It was certainly also really good to see the return of the Punisher. Even if his appearance in this season was brief, the chemistry between Charlie Cox and Jon Bernthal was phenomenal and left me looking forward to the upcoming Punisher special. The series doesn't shy away from the violence and the gore, and it was good seeing Muse, one of the most chilling villains from the comics, also making an appearance. Sadly, the whole storyline felt a bit rushed, and didn't reach the level of creepiness and horror of the "Dark Art" comic book run. That's not to say the character was adapted badly, but the whole arc felt like it didn't reach its full potential and was too quickly wrapped up. It mostly felt that Muse was basically there as a device to finally push Matt to go back to being Daredevil again, and to further move forward Heather's plot, rather than to tell the story of that specific villain.

Photo courtesy of Marvel Television. © 2025 MARVEL. All Rights Reserved.
Overall, the show is an imperfect but certainly solid revival that brought back a lot of of the aspects that made Netflix's Daredevil great. It starts with a bang, then becomes a slow burn, but it eventually finds its pace. The way it ends leaves the door open for a ton of possibilities, both in regards to the plot and the characters that might be joining Daredevil and Karen next season. Opinions may vary, but I liked how we didn't see the Defenders, or any other familiar characters specifically show up in the end, as it would have been revealing too much, and it could potentially feel too gimmicky. That said, I really hope to see Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, Colleen Wing, and the rest make a return, one way or another.

Bringing back any beloved show after a decade isn't an easy task, doing so while going through a series of rewrites and other creative shortcomings doesn't help either, but despite its imperfections 'Born Again' has done right by the original show. The action scenes deliver, the social and political commentary is on-point, the old familiar characters make a strong return, and even though the finale did not conclude the story it managed to finish on a high note and set up the scene for a very promising Season 2.

Sunday, April 13, 2025

ARC Read: Nacelleverse Vol. 1: Biker Mice from Mars & RoboForce

cover of the Vol. 1: Biker Mice from Mars & RoboForce paperback
If you are someone who has been of cartoon-watching age (or of cartoon-watching habit, for that matter) sometime in the mid 90s, then there is a good chance that you remember the 'Biker Mice from Mars' show, you might even remember the slightly older 'Robo Force' toyline. You definitely also know that toy and comic book tie-ins for animated shows has been a decades-old tradition when it comes to cartoon entertainment. This book collects two of the latest such entries, as parts of the NacelleVerse, with the storylines setting up their respective animated series.

This volume includes the two runs of RoboForce #1–3 and Biker Mice from Mars #1–3, as well as NacelleVerse #0, all written by Melissa Flores whose excellent 'Mighty Morphin Power Rangers' and 'The Dead Lucky' runs have already established her as an ideal creator to handle similar material. It also features art by Rahmat Handoko, Rhoald Marcellius, Francis Portela, Diogenes Neves, and other well-known names in comics. Beyond the undeniably talented team behind it, and beyond its status as a cartoon tie-in, this book is actually an also pretty fun read.

With similar tie-ins, it's not uncommon for the quality to be less than stellar, and for the books to only exist as promotional, nostalgia-bait material. So it was good to see that this is certainly not the case here. There are the familiar characters and lore, but there is also a well-crafted storyline that combines both feeling true to the original and also fitting modern standards. Overall an enjoyable, action-packed, and nostalgia-fuelled read, whether you're already a fan or you're curious to discover those franchises.

A big thank you to Oni Press for providing an advance review copy. The book is expected to come out on May 20, 2025.

Friday, April 11, 2025

ARC Read: Murder on the Books

Book cover showing a green background with a black font with the book title and a cat playing with one of the o's in the word book which is hanging from a string.
'Murder on the Books' follows Charlotte (Charley) James, a successful thriller writer who after experiencing a burnout decides to take a break and go back to her hometown, where not everyone knows about her author status as she has been writing her books under a pseudonym. Through an interesting turn of events, Charley finds herself in charge of a bookshop, as her best friend's business partner Sheila suddenly disappears, which in turn puts her in the middle of a murder mystery when she ends up discovering Sheila's dead body in the basement.

The book certainly lives up to the cosy mystery claim, it's a fun and fast read that keeps you invested. The plot isn't too complex, and it does require some suspension of disbelief in regards to the circumstances, but that is pretty much the norm of the genre, especially when it involves a civilian main character taking it on their own to investigate a murder. Charley felt real and relatable, her connection with her best friend felt refreshing, and the approach that the book takes to experiencing a burnout, needing a break, and to mental health in general, feels also quite realistic. With a plot that involves its main protagonist moving to a small town, taking over a bookstore, adopting a cat, and using their intellect to solve a crime, there's a lot to like here.

As this is the first of the 'Cozy Bookshop mystery' books, the characters are newly introduced and their circumstances are just being established, but the book soon finds its pace and becomes both a highly enjoyable read and a promising beginning to the series.

Big thank you to Severn House for providing an advance review copy. The book is coming out on the 1st of July, 2025.

Saturday, April 05, 2025

ARC Read: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Vol. 1: Return to New York

Cover of the TMNT Return to New York vol 1 comic
As a kid I discovered the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon sometime in the mid-90s, and much like every other show I used to watch growing up, any new version or modern adaptation of such material immediately strikes a nostalgic nerve in me. Add to that the fact that 'Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Vol. 1: Return to New York' is written by Jason Aaron, whose Thor/Mighty Thor runs and work in the Star Wars comics I thoroughly enjoyed, and features art by Joëlle Jones, Rafael Albuquerque, Cliff Chiang, and Darick Robertson, and it's no surprise that I was really eager to read this book.

Having now finished the first volume, I can say that 'Return to New York' certainly didn't disappoint. Even though it's a continuation and not a reboot, it's a pretty good starting point for new readers. The story is noticeably grittier and more violent than the original series, but never gets exploitative or edgy for the sake of edginess.

The book starts with the turtles separated, each in a different place and situation, which works well in (re)introducing them, establishing their different personalities and perspectives, and setting up the story for when they eventually reunite. The plot worked well, making for a fast-paced read, the art, considering it involved such great talent, was everything I expected it to be, and the story is very much in the spirit of TMNT. I will absolutely be grabbing Vol. 2, no question.

A big thank you to IDW Publishing for offering me an Advance Readers Copy in exchange for an honest review. The book is coming out on June 24, 2025.

Recent Watch: Flow (2024)

Movie poster of the film Flow

First time I watched 'Flow' was at the cinema, but upon second viewing I can now confirm that the internet was right about the effect that the film has on cats. Can also confirm that it remains a masterclass in visual storytelling, and a beautiful and tender tale about survival and found family that evokes thoughts and emotions without the use of any dialogue.

Such an incredible achievement by a small team, all done with open source software. People keep repeating how impressive it is that it was created in Blender for good reason, because it is legitimately one of the most stunning animated films that have been released in the recent years. 100% worth every bit of praise it has received.

 

Two pictures showing my calico cat Carrie standing in front of the TV which is showing two scenes from the film Flow, depicting a black cat running in a field full of greenery, on the top picture the cat is visible from a distance while there is a lake as the main focus, on the bottom picture the same cat is running away from a pack of dogs that are running behind it.

 

Monday, March 31, 2025

ARC Read: The Age of Video Games: A Graphic History of Gaming from Pong to VR and Beyond

I got my hands on an advance copy of 'The Age of Video Games: A Graphic History of Gaming from Pong to VR and Beyond', written by journalist Jean Zeid and illustrated by Émilie Rouge, a graphic novel that sets out to cover the long history of video games as a medium. As someone who has been fascinated by games since the age of 5, I found the concept extremely interesting, and having read the entire thing I can say that the book certainly did not disappoint.

'The Age of Video Games' has its two protagonists, Jean and Émilie themselves, travel through time, and sometimes into the worlds of each specific game they are referencing, telling the story of how video games started as a concept, how they interconnect with the history of programming and the personal computer, and how they evolved into the global industry that is now an inseparable part of modern pop culture. There are also many mentions of the people who helped shape the gaming medium, from the early days of the Atari and on. It was good seeing some lesser known names appear, and also seeing the many, many women who have been a part of gaming history since the beginning, being mentioned and credited for their contributions too.

The book wins major points for using comic book format to tell its story. Having the reader being flooded with facts could have become boring very soon, but the beautiful, colourful illustrations accompanying the banter really kept things interesting. I loved the art, and I loved all the video game references and how it changed and adapted accordingly when it depicted different worlds and characters. It kept a solid balance between remaining consistent and making each homage immediately recognisable.

Of course it was impossible to reference every single game, but the book really does an impressive job in covering a lot of ground in that regard. Apart from the big players that one cannot omit when talking about the history of gaming, it was nice seeing indie titles also referenced. On a personal level, it was also good seeing games like 'Full Throttle', 'Maniac Mansion, and 'Grim Fandango' pop up as well. If I had a nitpick, it was that the modern slang sometimes felt a bit inorganic, but admittedly the jokes between the two characters did land for me.

It's a read I'd recommend to anyone with an interest in the history of gaming, as it's a love letter to the medium written with a lot of knowledge and a lot of love for the subject matter.

A big thank you to Andrews McMeel Publishing for providing me with a copy.

The book is expected to be published on July 22, 2025.

Sunday, March 30, 2025

Artificially Generated Colourful Empty Husk

(Stock photo by Aleksandar Pasaric) 

This is hardly an unpopular opinion, nor an attempt to make any groundbreaking statement beyond putting some personal thoughts out there, but I honestly never got the appeal of AI generated so-called "art". 

With the most recent online trend of having AI generated images sort of resembling the art style of Studio Ghibli, beyond the words of Hayao Miyazaki himself, who had previously called similar technology "disgusting" in the past, with "I can't watch this stuff and find [it] interesting. Whoever creates this stuff has no idea what pain is whatsoever. I am utterly disgusted. If you really want to make creepy stuff, you can go ahead and do it. I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all" being his exact quote, and the disrespect towards him this practice implies, I was also reminded of this quote by Guillermo del Toro, said during a conversation with the British Film Institute (during which he also interestingly enough mentions the work and influence of Miyazaki as well, full video here):

“I saw a demo of AI and I thought oh that's what people think animation is, giving prompts and the computer does it. You know, but AI has demonstrated that it can do semi-compelling screensavers. That's essentially that. The value of art is not how much it costs and how little effort it requires, it’s how much would you risk to be in its presence. How much would people pay for those screensavers? Are they going to make them cry because they lost a son? A mother? Because they misspent their youth? Fuck no!”

And OK, on a very shallow level, I maybe understand the idea of it. It's pretty (to the beholder), and the text is usually coherent, and the pictures show what you asked for on demand, and heck, sometimes they even have the right amount of fingers. But on the other hand, creating art takes some real work, and this is how people pay their bills, and even if you manage to totally ignore that, or the legal and ethical issues that arise, or the mere fact that this is not some revolutionary digital parthenogenesis that magically creates things out of thin air, but relies on taking thousands of hours of hard work, skill, pain, emotion, inspiration, practice and personal experiences, in the vast majority of cases without the creator's consent, putting them in a blender, and spitting out something that somewhat resembles the original, or the fact that it has contributed so heavily to the spread of disinformation, the way it has been used as a tool for online abuse and harassment in the form of revenge pornography, and the negative impact that it has been proven to have on the environment, my sentimental little brain still cannot fully get why would anyone be fascinated by something that nobody made.

During such discussions, though not specifically about AI, I'm also reminded of this quote by Ethan Hawke on TED, highlighting the importance of human creativity:

“Do you think human creativity matters? Well, most people don’t spend a lot of time thinking about poetry, right? They have a life to live and they’re really not that concerned with Allen Ginsberg’s poems or anyone’s poems—until, their father dies; they go to a funeral; you lose a child; someone breaks your heart. And all of a sudden you’re desperate for making sense out of this life. ‘Has anybody felt this bad before? How did they come out of this cloud?’ Or the inverse—something great. You meet somebody and your heart explodes—you love them so much you can’t even see straight. You’re dizzy. ‘Did anybody feel like this before? What is happening to me?’ And that’s when art’s not a luxury—it’s actually sustenance. We need it.”

 I don't think it's a coincidence that both del Toro and Hawke talk about sadness, loss, and grief in connection to how important art is. I think the question "Did anybody feel like this before?" pretty much sums up my entire point. Because one of the biggest ways in which we find value in art, whether it's a song, a paragraph of text, a quote even, a photograph or a painting, it's in how it communicates that someone, somewhere, at some point in their life felt a certain way and sat down and expressed it in a manner that speaks to you, lets you process your own feelings, inspires you, and tells you that you are not alone in your joy or your sadness. That some stranger out there has felt that distinct kind of loneliness or thrill, and oddly understands that specific part of you, even if nobody else does.

Sure art comes in many forms, not all of them so serious. It's silly and funny, and sometimes flawed and nonsensical, but essentially it's a very human way to connect with another person who had something inside them to say, and to receive something out of it. And that's not something that can be replicated or mass produced. Whatever it is that AI creates, if you take the human factor out of the equation, it simply ceases to be art.


Friday, March 28, 2025

Recent Read: Severance - The Lexington Letter

 

After the finale of Season 2, I decided to give 'Severance - The Lexington Letter' another read to fill this Friday's Severance void, and it's really a great companion to the show, with an interesting twist/reveal in the end.

It obviously doesn't provide any huge answers that the show hasn't offered yet, but it offers several little titbits and information on how Lumon operates from the perspective of a newly-introduced severed character who grows more and more suspicious of the company, and has discovered a way to cheat the system and communicate with her outie self, in a way that fits with the "some things transcend severance" themes of the series.

I wouldn't read it before watching the show, because it still contains plenty of spoilers for the earlier episodes, but it's a good tie-in to dig into after the first half of Season 1 and onward. It's not a long read, but the attention to detail, and the dystopically hilarious 'Macrodata Refiner's Orientation Booklet' that is included, are very much in the spirit of the show and make this a must-read, especially since it's available for free. Going back to it after 'Cold Harbor' really makes some things connect more.


Thursday, March 27, 2025

Recent Read: Elektra by Greg Rucka Ultimate Collection

 

I have really enjoyed a lot of Greg Rucka's work, and I find Elektra very interesting as a flawed character, but I couldn't really get into this book. There's an extreme tonal whiplash between the attempt to tackle serious issues like sexual assault, trauma, severe depression, and dealing with consequences, and the oversexualization of the main character in every other page.

Nothing wrong with characters like Emma Frost, for example, expressing their sexuality on their own terms, and nothing wrong with skimpy outfits or ridiculous costumes and unrealistic situations, but this works better in books that don't take themselves so seriously. There is something really off, seeing a woman who is clearly depicted to be suffering, mentally straggling, and going through a breakdown, also having her costume constantly and conveniently torn to reveal even more skin, and posed and exposed in a way that is clearly meant to titillate the reader. It's not the first comic to have women drawn as if someone forgot how gravity, human breasts, and fabric work, but it just feels extra out of place here, considering the mature themes of the plot.

The story also doesn't seem to go anywhere, or know what it's trying to say. Reading this in 2025, it definitely feels like a product of a different era of comic books.

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

20 Years Since the 2005 Doctor Who Revival


 

Today marks 20 years since 'Rose', the first episode of the 2005 'Doctor Who' revival aired, featuring Christopher Eccleston as the leather-jacket-wearing, witty and dorky 9th Doctor and Billie Piper as Rose Tyler, ending a 16 year hiatus.

Hard to believe that it's already been 2 decades. Ever since I stumbled upon reruns of Tom Baker’s Doctor, I've had a special place in my heart for this show. I'd say despite its weirdness, but it's more likely because of it. It had a limited budget, plenty of campiness, extra cheese, and lots of heart (two hearts, to be precise), and it made this combo work.

It's not for everyone, and that's OK, and it had its hits and misses since it first aired back in 1963, but at a time where so much of the current entertainment confuses cynicism and bleakness with realism, and edgy and misanthropic is presented as cool, I'm glad that shows that remain unapologetically silly, and hopeful, and sometimes sentimental, and at the same time always relevant and political still have their place. So I'm happy this peculiar little show is still around doing its thing.

"You lot, you spend all your time thinking about dying. Like you're gonna get killed by eggs or beef, or global warming or asteroids. But you never take time to imagine the impossible - that maybe you survive." - S1E02 The End of the World

 


 


Copyright © 2013-2025 All Rights Reserved